Sunday, February 02, 2020

WHAT'RE YOU GONNA TO DO ABOUT IT?


It's infuriating that the Senate's position from the very start was, "We're not voting to remove him no matter what the evidence is." And the stance of Lamar Alexander and others that the House managers made their case but that they just don't care is appalling in its irresponsibility and cynicism. History will not be kind. 

[Alexander] “I worked with other senators to make sure that we have the right to ask for more documents and witnesses, but there is no need for more evidence to prove something that has already been proven . . . There is no need for more evidence to prove that the president asked Ukraine to investigate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter; he said this on television on October 3, 2019, and during his July 25, 2019, telephone call with the president of Ukraine. There is no need for more evidence to conclude that the president withheld United States aid, at least in part, to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens; the House managers have proved this with what they call a ‘mountain of overwhelming evidence.’ . . . It was inappropriate for the president to ask a foreign leader to investigate his political opponent and to withhold United States aid to encourage that investigation.  . . . The question then is not whether the president did it, but whether the United States Senate or the American people should decide what to do about what he did. . . . Let the people decide.”   

But let's look at the pure politics -- and try to make the best of things. First, people are furious -- and let's hope this fires up the anti-Trump majority to remove him for real. Second, the underlying facts of what he did were flawlessly laid out by the House investigation and the case presented in the Senate -- and more detail and confirmation are sure to come out from Bolton and others, one way or another. Third, the House still has the option to reopen hearings, and in many ways it is better to do it there, without time pressure, than a rushed job of interviewing one or two witnesses in the Senate. The obvious incompleteness of the Senate non-trial, given the new revelations that have come out, gives the House a clear justification for doing so. 

Finally, aside from Trump we have a chance to punish the liars and enablers in the Senate, and take Moscow Mitch's majority away. That would be an apt punishment for all of them


[NB: It is an ongoing theme of this blog that in politics sometimes when you win, you lose. A short-term benefit can have damaging long-term consequences. The price you pay for a victory may cost you, later on. The people who lose in one vote or contest get fired up to win the next one. 

This is, I think, the challenge for all of us. Trump's method is to assume the inevitability of getting what he wants, of bullying others into thinking there's no point in opposing him, of bragging over powers he arrogates to himself until and unless someone says NO. There is only way to stop him, which is to STOP HIM. It's up to us now.] 

It ain't over

https://crooksandliars.com/2020/02/rep-swalwell-explains-why-trump-s-problems

In other investigation news . . . 

AFTER the Senate decides they don't want any more evidence, the WH admits that they've been hiding emails that show Trump's true intentions about Ukraine

https://politicalwire.com/2020/02/01/trump-still-blocking-dozens-of-ukraine-emails/ 
“Hours after the Senate voted against seeking new evidence in the impeachment case against President Trump, the administration acknowledged in a midnight court filing Friday the existence of two dozen emails that reveal the president’s thinking about withholding military aid to Ukraine . . . The filing marks the first official acknowledgment from the Trump administration that emails about the President’s thinking related to the aid exist, and that he was directly involved in asking about and deciding on the aid as early as June. The administration is still blocking those emails from the public and has successfully kept them from Congress.”  

More: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/02/white-house-admits-blocking-emails-trump-thinking-ukraine-aid.html  

Hmmm . . .

https://digbysblog.net/2020/02/suicide-pact/
All week, I’ve wondered if Trump’s attempts to undermine Joe Biden’s bid for the presidency may have strengthened it. All the negative attention Trump has paid to Biden and his son reinforces the notion that Biden is Trump’s strongest potential opponent. Trump certainly thinks so. He’d rather run against Bernie Sanders. Whatever the progressive wing of the Democratic Party may want in a candidate, Biden may be what Democratic and independent voters most want in 2020: someone who can defeat Trump. And Trump himself and his impeachment defense team have been making the case all week that Joe Biden is that candidate.  
 
In other news . . .

This was published on Nov 10, 2016, right after Trump's election, by someone who had lived in Putin's Russia

https://www.nybooks.com/daily/2016/11/10/trump-election-autocracy-rules-for-survival/
[Obama] added, “The point, though, is that we all go forward with a presumption of good faith in our fellow citizens, because that presumption of good faith is essential to a vibrant and functioning democracy.” As if Donald Trump had not conned his way into hours of free press coverage, as though he had released (and paid) his taxes, or not brazenly denigrated our system of government, from the courts and Congress, to the election process itself—as if, in other words, he had not won the election precisely by acting in bad faith. . . . However well-intentioned, this talk assumes that Trump is prepared to find common ground with his many opponents, respect the institutions of government, and repudiate almost everything he has stood for during the campaign. In short, it is treating him as a “normal” politician. There has until now been little evidence that he can be one. . . .

It was as though Donald Trump had not, in the course of his campaign, promised to deport US citizens, promised to create a system of surveillance targeted specifically at Muslim Americans, promised to build a wall on the border with Mexico, advocated war crimes, endorsed torture, and repeatedly threatened to jail Hillary Clinton herself. It was as though those statements and many more could be written off as so much campaign hyperbole and now that the campaign was over, Trump would be eager to become a regular, rule-abiding politician of the pre-Trump era. . . 

Trump is anything but a regular politician and this has been anything but a regular election. Trump will be only the fourth candidate in history and the second in more than a century to win the presidency after losing the popular vote. He is also probably the first candidate in history to win the presidency despite having been shown repeatedly by the national media to be a chronic liar, sexual predator, serial tax-avoider, and race-baiter who has attracted the likes of the Ku Klux Klan. Most important, Trump is the first candidate in memory who ran not for president but for autocrat—and won. . . .

I have lived in autocracies most of my life, and have spent much of my career writing about Vladimir Putin’s Russia. I have learned a few rules for surviving in an autocracy and salvaging your sanity and self-respect. It might be worth considering them now:

Rule #1: Believe the autocrat. He means what he says. Whenever you find yourself thinking, or hear others claiming, that he is exaggerating, that is our innate tendency to reach for a rationalization . . .

He has no political establishment into which to fold himself following the campaign, and therefore no reason to shed his campaign rhetoric. On the contrary: it is now the establishment that is rushing to accommodate him—from the president, who met with him at the White House on Thursday, to the leaders of the Republican Party, who are discarding their long-held scruples to embrace his radical positions. . . .

Rule #2: Do not be taken in by small signs of normality. . . .

Rule #3: Institutions will not save you. . . .

Rule #4: Be outraged. . . .

Rule #5: Don’t make compromises. . . .

Rule #6: Remember the future. . . . [read on]

More: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/2/1/1915681/-For-the-sake-of-our-country-we-all-better-read-this-again-because-every-word-of-it-is-coming-true

Behind the scenes at NOAA when Trump falsified a hurricane forecast just to cover up his own stupid mistake

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/emails-show-panic-anger-at-noaa-after-trumps-doctored-hurricane-forecast

Experts are predicting a massive voter turnout in the Fall. Are we ready to handle it?

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/31/1913186/-U-S-could-face-a-voting-deluge-in-November-Will-states-be-ready-for-the-storm

Fascinating word clouds about each major Dem candidate: most fascinating are words that people consider "positive" or "negative"

https://digbysblog.net/2020/02/a-word-cloud-to-ponder/

This ongoing Hillary/Bernie feud is stupid and destructive. It helped ruin 2016 and it won't help 2020. We need a unified party behind whomever is the nominee

Is Michael Bloomberg for real?

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/dem-candidates-angry-with-dnc-over-new-debate-rules-that-favor-bloomberg
Dem Candidates Angry With DNC Over New Debate Rules That Favor Bloomberg

More: https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/31/bloomberg-spent-200-million-in-five-weeks/
Bloomberg Spent $200 Million In Five Weeks

https://politicalwire.com/2020/02/01/bloomberg-proposes-5-trillion-in-taxes-on-the-rich/
Bloomberg Proposes $5 Trillion in Taxes on the Rich

https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/15/bloomberg-holds-biggest-lead-over-trump-in-michigan/
Bloomberg Holds Biggest Lead Over Trump In Michigan


***If you enjoy Progressive Blog Digest and support what we are doing, you can help by forwarding a copy of this issue to your friends (using the envelope link below) or by sharing its URL (http://pbd.blogspot.com) with others via email or social media. Thanks for helping to spread the word!

I don’t get anything personally out of this project, except the satisfaction of doing it (I don’t run ads, etc.). The credit really all goes to the people whose material I copy and redistribute. But if I do have a “mission,” it is to get this information into the hands of as many people as I can.***

Saturday, February 01, 2020

FOR SHAME


OK, where do we stand? It's appalling to see how shameless the GOP has become in their support of a man they privately admit is incompetent, dangerous, and corrupt. For the rest of us, it's important to remember that Mitch McConnell's Senate was never going to support witnesses, never going to do a real investigation, and never put out facts that they knew would only publicly confirm Trump's guilt -- and so make it harder for them to reach their preordained conclusion of acquitting him. AND THEY ADMITTED SO. Their distortion of the very idea of a "trial" and their cynical abandonment of constitutional principles and obligations just show how far they have sunk.

But here's what we can't let happen. We can't let this be framed (as in the stupid CNN video below) as the DEMOCRATS' failure. The Dems did almost everything right: they did a thorough investigation in the House with blockbuster witnesses who were reasoned and credible; the House GOP yelled and threw out irrelevancies. In the Senate, the House managers were impressive, laying out a clear and evidence-driven argument; the Trump lawyers responded with outrageous and internally inconsistent arguments that increasingly coalesced around: the President gets to do whatever he wants. Lamar Alexander's final excuse is the culmination: Yes he did it all, but I will not vote to find him guilty.

There is an election coming -- and the only option left is to KEEP focus on the facts, highlight Bolton's disclosures, and other disclosures sure to come, to show the failure of the GOP's rush to judgment. Most people wanted witnesses, most people believe Trump did wrong, and most people want him removed from office. Let's make those numbers go up. We need to avoid despair and keep people angry and determined to take matters into their own hands in the Fall

CNN: https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1222940849350291457 

More: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/31/1915389/-Nancy-Pelosi-and-Adam-Schiff-did-everything-right-and-the-House-management-team-are-American-heroes
Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff did everything right. The House managers are American heroes

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/31/1915377/-Republicans-agree-Trump-is-guilty-as-charged-but-they-don-t-care-and-will-vote-to-cover-it-up
Republicans agree Trump is guilty as charged, but they don't care and will vote to cover it up

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/echoing-team-trump-gop-flips-foreign-election-interference
Echoing Team Trump, GOP flips on foreign election interference 

https://crooksandliars.com/2020/01/jonathan-lemire-donald-trumps-republican
'This Is Donald Trump's Republican Party Now'

https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/31/gop-refuses-to-defy-trump-under-almost-any-circumstances/
“Republican hopes of blocking former national security adviser John Bolton’s impeachment testimony highlight the Trump-era GOP’s defining characteristic: its refusal to defy the President under almost any circumstances.” “President Trump’s vituperative attacks, regularly trained on critics through his vast social media following, make every Republican politician wary of crossing him . . . More significantly, decades of American political realignment have tightened the bonds holding Republicans together in any high-stakes fight with Democrats. The ongoing diversification of American society further unites an overwhelmingly white GOP around a shared fear of impending doom.” 

https://www.salon.com/2020/01/31/voting-to-acquit-this-noxious-criminal-is-the-point-of-no-return-for-the-republican-party/
Voting to acquit this noxious criminal is the point of no return for the Republican Party

Commentary: https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/31/1915135/-Abbreviated-Pundit-Round-up-The-impeachment-sham-trial-has-an-end-but-not-an-exoneration
"I am going to reserve comment on this moment of disgrace until I have properly composed my thoughts on it." [read on]

https://crooksandliars.com/2020/01/scarborough-truth-all-come-out-anyway-far
"But you have the person who saw the murder, who actually has been holding the bloody murder weapon, who's ready to testify, who wants to testify, and the Republicans decided last night they didn't want to hear that person testify. "Now listen. I'm fine with it, because the Republicans have shamed themselves already, they're going to vote to acquit, this information's gonna come out anyway in a far less controlled manner, so the truth will be known, it'll be shouted from the mountaintops. "It's just gonna make the Republicans look worse." 

More and more Repubs are picking up on the Lamar Alexander excuse: he did it, we don't need more witnesses to convince us he did it. . . . but we don't care

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/31/1915496/-Senate-Republicans-vary-from-tortured-to-triumphant-in-abetting-the-Trump-McConnell-cover-up

Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) switches her vote to "no" on witnesses, but her rationale is interesting . . . and can certainly be read more than one way

https://www.axios.com/lisa-murkowski-trump-impeachment-trial-witnesses-dfe35d05-204c-4eae-8920-823d32ecec3f.html
"Given the partisan nature of this impeachment from the very beginning and throughout, I have come to the conclusion that there will be no fair trial in the Senate. I don't believe the continuation of the process will change anything. It is sad for me to admit, as an institution, Congress has failed . . . We are sadly at a low point of division in this country."

More: https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/bring-down-the-hammer
We can and should criticize these excuses. But what is important to see is how much Republican senators are struggling to justify and explain their decision, not only on the eventual verdict but on even holding a real trial. These are bad explanations but their badness is underlined by their complexity. When you’re arguing that well, we knew he did it and that’s why we endorsed the refusal to testify and later endorsed not even holding a trial because even though we knew he did it it seemed like a bad idea to remove him from office. If that’s your argument you’re losing. . . . 

Final vote, 51-49 against: https://www.thedailybeast.com/senate-republicans-decide-not-to-hear-new-info-about-trumps-alleged-corruption-in-trump-impeachment-trial

Uh, Donald. . . .

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1223381882902986752
"Democrats = 17 Witnesses. Republicans = 0 Witnesses."

Trump did not want the "not okay but not impeachable" defense -- but that's what he got

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republicans-agree-it-was-no-perfect-call--but-will-vote-to-acquit-trump-anyway/2020/01/31/7ec659a0-445e-11ea-aa6a-083d01b3ed18_story.html

Another huge Bolton revelation

https://www.salon.com/2020/01/31/bolton-claims-trump-directly-instructed-him-to-help-with-his-pressure-campaign-in-new-book-report_partner/
The New York Times is reporting that former national security adviser John Bolton will claim in his upcoming book that President Donald Trump personally asked him to help shake down the Ukrainian government in exchange for dirt on former Vice President Joe Biden.  Specifically, the Times reports, Bolton writes that in May 2018 Trump directly instructed him "to help with his pressure campaign to extract damaging information on Democrats from Ukrainian officials." According to Bolton, the president asked him to call up Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and ask him to work with personal attorney Rudy Giuliani, who was leading the effort to dig up dirt on Biden. Bolton writes that he never called Zelensky. Bolton also writes that multiple Trump allies and officials were in the room when the president made his request, including Giuliani, chief of staff Mick Mulvaney, and attorney Pat Cipollone, who is now defending the president at his Senate impeachment trial. . . .

More: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/reporting-sheds-surprising-new-light-trumps-directives-bolton

[NB: That's right: the head of the Trump defense team is a fact witness to the actions that they are denying ever happened.]

Trump denies the story -- but Rudy confirms it

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/31/trump-john-bolton-ukraine-aid-109995

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/31/1915450/-Giuiliani-confirms-latest-Bolton-bombshell-in-the-most-Rudy-way-possible

It's not over

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2020/01/31/if-trump-is-acquitted-the-house-democrats-should-press-ahead/
If Trump is Acquitted, the House Democrats Should Press Ahead . . . For this purpose, they could set up a special committee to basically compile a full investigation unencumbered by time constraints. You could think of it as their own special investigator or prosecutor. Their mission would be to document everything for history in a final report, which could make recommendations for people who should be charged. . . .

[NB: Start with Bolton. . .  now.]

In other investigation news . . .

Zelensky STILL can't get a WH visit

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/pompeo-insists-theres-no-condition-for-zelensky-to-visit-wh-but-wont-say-when-he-can
Pompeo Insists There’s ‘No Condition’ For Zelensky To Visit WH But Won’t Say When He Can

[NB: YES, it is clear that they were extorting him and YES they are still doing it. Now that Trump has survived the impeachment trial, does anyone think he will stop this way of doing business? He wants those investigations, dammit!]

Lev Parnas wants to testify -- but it will be up to the House now

http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/parnas-lawyer-offers-mcconnell-info-directly-relevant-trial

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/31/1915530/-Lev-Parnas-pours-gasoline-on-McConnell-s-fire-detailing-gigantic-conspiracy-he-could-testify-to

The wackiest arguments from Team Trump

https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/team-trump-impeachment-questions

Alan Dershowitz is being slammed -- and deserves it

https://crooksandliars.com/2020/01/alan-dershowitz-pouts-about-being

It looks like the Senate will push an acquittal vote until after the State of the Union, denying Trump the chance to crow on national TV. I wonder why they are doing it, and whether even from the Repubs this is a little message to him

https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/31/trump-signed-off-on-mcconnell-plan-to-end-trial/
 
Trump's future: lawsuits and state-level investigations that AG Bill Barr can't block

https://www.vox.com/2019/11/4/20947841/e-jean-carroll-donald-trump-defamation-lawsuit

More: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/key-senators-take-closer-look-the-other-whistleblower
For many, the word "whistleblower" immediately calls to mind the official from the U.S. intelligence community. There is, however, another. 

In other news . . .

Trump's Mighty Impregnable Wall™. . . . isn't

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/trump-mexico-border-wall-gates-left-open-flash-floods.html 
Welcome to the absolute dumbness of it all. This is what happens when reality gets retrofitted to accommodate a bad idea. You end up with this, the Trump border wall, that apparently will need, essentially, to be left open for months at a time to accommodate flash flooding during the summer “monsoon season.” This episode of reality bites, the Washington Post reports, is brought to us by in the know border officials, agents, and engineers. Here’s the most maddening part from the Post: along the more remote portions of the southern border, large unmanned gates that need to be manually raised ahead of the seasonal flooding, and then left open for months to accommodate the large amounts of debris carried with it, are already being waltzed through by smugglers and undocumented migrants. Put more simply: the wall is already not working, so let’s build more! . . . 

As expected, Trump expands his travel ban

https://www.vox.com/2020/1/31/21116736/trump-travel-ban-nigeria-immigrant  

Trump's assault on Medicaid

https://crooksandliars.com/2020/01/trump-wrecking-ball-just-keeps-swinging

Yes, it's coming: Space Wars!

https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-is-mystery-russian-spacecraft-cosmos-2542-suddenly-stalking-a-us-spy-satellite
A mysterious Russian spacecraft has maneuvered into a new orbit around Earth right behind a secret U.S. spy satellite. The unusual move by Russian Cosmos 2542 on Jan. 20 allows it to closely watch the American KH-11, a $4 billion orbital telescope staring down at Earth. And there’s not much that U.S. space operators can do about it. . . .

Duh: http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/trump-genuinely-seems-believe-f-35s-are-literally-invisible
Trump genuinely seems to believe F-35s are literally invisible

Here comes Brexit

https://www.vox.com/2020/1/31/21087676/brexit-timeline-boris-johnson-whats-next

Good news for Bernie

https://www.vox.com/2020/1/31/21113780/bernie-sanders-socialism-electability-primaries
Bernie Sanders leads Donald Trump in polls, even when you remind people he’s a socialist 

More: https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2020/01/heres-whos-leading-in-the-final-iowa-polls/
Here’s Who’s Leading in the Final Iowa Polls . . .

Bonus item: Funny. Trump doesn't know who's playing in the Super Bowl. But that's not what's funny -- here's his BS answer

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/31/1915396/--Two-very-interesting-teams-Donald-Trump-doesn-t-know-who-s-playing-in-the-Super-Bowl
“Well, I love them both, let's just say. But I will tell you, some two very interesting teams and interesting players, some really great players. And it's going to be hopefully a great Super Bowl.”

***If you enjoy Progressive Blog Digest and support what we are doing, you can help by forwarding a copy of this issue to your friends (using the envelope link below) or by sharing its URL (http://pbd.blogspot.com) with others via email or social media. Thanks for helping to spread the word!

I don’t get anything personally out of this project, except the satisfaction of doing it (I don’t run ads, etc.). The credit really all goes to the people whose material I copy and redistribute. But if I do have a “mission,” it is to get this information into the hands of as many people as I can.***