Bush got Saddam Hussein, Obama got Bin Laden. You know Trump wanted a big name for his collection too
https://www.axios.com/us-iran-war-footing-qasem-soleimani-airstrike-13cbe74f-9095-47b4-8d03-85f1e702f447.html
"In killing General Soleimani," the N.Y. Times reports, "Trump took an action that Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama had rejected, fearing it would lead to war between the United States and Iran." . . .
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/soleimani-trump-muhandis-iran-iraq.html
The United States is now at war with Iran. . . . It is hard to discern how Trump, who ordered the assassination personally, thinks this will play out. On New Year’s Eve, he told reporters that he wanted peace with Iran. . . [read on]
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/1/3/21048033/trump-iran-war-qassem-suleimani-retaliation
Why this situation is so damn scary . . .
Safer?
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/3/1909256/-Mike-Pompeo-claims-killing-Soleimani-made-Americans-safer-as-his-own-department-tells-them-to-run
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was out to cheerlead in the wake of U.S. airstrikes that killed Iranian general Qassem Soleimani . . . “The world is a much safer place today. I can assure you that Americans in the region are much safer.”
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/state-department-leave-iraq-trump-attack-iranian-leader
State Dept Urges US Citizens To Leave Iraq After Trump-Authorized Strike On Iranian Leader
"A war footing"
"In killing General Soleimani," the N.Y. Times reports, "Trump took an action that Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama had rejected, fearing it would lead to war between the United States and Iran." . . .
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/soleimani-trump-muhandis-iran-iraq.html
The United States is now at war with Iran. . . . It is hard to discern how Trump, who ordered the assassination personally, thinks this will play out. On New Year’s Eve, he told reporters that he wanted peace with Iran. . . [read on]
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/1/3/21048033/trump-iran-war-qassem-suleimani-retaliation
Why this situation is so damn scary . . .
Safer?
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/3/1909256/-Mike-Pompeo-claims-killing-Soleimani-made-Americans-safer-as-his-own-department-tells-them-to-run
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was out to cheerlead in the wake of U.S. airstrikes that killed Iranian general Qassem Soleimani . . . “The world is a much safer place today. I can assure you that Americans in the region are much safer.”
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/state-department-leave-iraq-trump-attack-iranian-leader
State Dept Urges US Citizens To Leave Iraq After Trump-Authorized Strike On Iranian Leader
"A war footing"
https://www.axios.com/us-iran-war-footing-qasem-soleimani-airstrike-13cbe74f-9095-47b4-8d03-85f1e702f447.html
A few months ago, Trump was musing about bringing U.S. troops home from the Middle East, and to let others fight it out in the sand. Now, he’s adding forces, and they’re necessarily on a war footing . . . Trump now has to prepare for an extreme backlash from Iran — and likely intensified attacks on U.S. forces in the Middle East, and anywhere else within Iran’s planning reach.
https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/u-s-deploys-additional-troops-to-middle-east/
The U.S. will deploy thousands of additional troops to the Middle East as tensions with Iran mount . . .
[NB: Expect this to become a big factor in impeachment: "How can the Dems undermine the authority of the Commander in Chief at a time of international crisis?"]
A few months ago, Trump was musing about bringing U.S. troops home from the Middle East, and to let others fight it out in the sand. Now, he’s adding forces, and they’re necessarily on a war footing . . . Trump now has to prepare for an extreme backlash from Iran — and likely intensified attacks on U.S. forces in the Middle East, and anywhere else within Iran’s planning reach.
https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/u-s-deploys-additional-troops-to-middle-east/
The U.S. will deploy thousands of additional troops to the Middle East as tensions with Iran mount . . .
[NB: Expect this to become a big factor in impeachment: "How can the Dems undermine the authority of the Commander in Chief at a time of international crisis?"]
Here it comes: https://www.thedailybeast.com/foxs-stuart-varney-you-cant-impeach-a-president-who-just-killed-a-terrorist
Fox’s Stuart Varney Wonders: Why Would You Impeach a President Who Just Killed a Terrorist?
"War" with Iran?
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/iran-trump-soleimani-response_n_5e0fbe4fc5b6b5a713ba3e26
Khamenei has vowed “forceful revenge” against the U.S. for Soleimani’s death . . . Already backed into a corner by Trump’s maximum pressure campaign of economic sanctions, analysts expect that Iran will retaliate but say a traditional military conflict isn’t something Tehran considers advantageous. “Iran has known for a very long time that it can’t win in any kind of conventional military warfare with the United States, but it has proven to be very sophisticated at asymmetric warfare,” Ellie Geranmayeh, a policy fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, told HuffPost . . . [I]t’s much more adept at relying on insurgent-style attacks and proxies to exert its influence. Iran cultivated a wide network of pro-Iranian militias under Soleimani’s leadership, and it’s possible that after his death those become the primary actors in responding to his killing. The U.S. has a wide range of interests, assets and allies that could all become targets for an Iranian response. These range from embassies and consulates to shipping routes and oil facilities . . . Iran may additionally target U.S. partners in the Middle East, which would threaten to draw more actors into the conflict . . . Iran and its proxies could also seek to target U.S. personnel in the region or carry out their own assassinations, an extreme option that would almost certainly lead to further escalations in the conflict . . . Military action is also not Iran’s only avenue for responding to Soleimani’s death. Since Trump withdrew from the 2015 nuclear deal in May 2018 and has since imposed harsh economic sanctions, Iran has continually threatened to no longer comply with the agreement to curb its nuclear program and has taken provocative but largely reversible steps to increase its uranium enrichment. Prior to Soleimani’s death, Iran was expected to issue a statement on its nuclear plans next week and may use the opportunity to announce a more aggressive move away from the nuclear deal and towards weapons-level enrichment. There is also the potential for Iran to carry out cyber attacks against the U.S. as a means of avoiding conventional conflict . . .
A president shouldn't carry out a major act like this without even informing, let alone consulting, the "Gang of Eight" in Congress. But Trump did tell Lindsey Graham . . . during a golf outing
https://www.thedailybeast.com/lindsey-graham-claims-he-was-briefed-about-suleimani-strike-during-trump-golf-trip
Idiot
https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/eric-trump-telegraphed-strike-against-iran/
Eric Trump Hinted at Strike Against Iran . . . In a now deleted tweet, Eric Trump apparently knew about the U.S. strike against an Iran military commander — and hinted to the world about it — two days before it happened. Said Trump: “Bout to open up a big ol’ can of whoop ass #DontMessWithTheBest #USAUSAUSA”
More: https://www.theroot.com/eric-trump-might-be-the-dumbest-trump-out-of-all-the-tr-1821743300
[NB: So Trump won't tell duly elected public officials because (he says) he can't trust them to keep it secret, but he does tell his moronic son -- who doesn't.]
By the way, thinking back I see this story about New Year's resolutions in a new light
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-new-year-resolution_n_5e0c228ee4b0b2520d1bf1a9
https://www.thedailybeast.com/lindsey-graham-claims-he-was-briefed-about-suleimani-strike-during-trump-golf-trip
Idiot
https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/eric-trump-telegraphed-strike-against-iran/
Eric Trump Hinted at Strike Against Iran . . . In a now deleted tweet, Eric Trump apparently knew about the U.S. strike against an Iran military commander — and hinted to the world about it — two days before it happened. Said Trump: “Bout to open up a big ol’ can of whoop ass #DontMessWithTheBest #USAUSAUSA”
More: https://www.theroot.com/eric-trump-might-be-the-dumbest-trump-out-of-all-the-tr-1821743300
[NB: So Trump won't tell duly elected public officials because (he says) he can't trust them to keep it secret, but he does tell his moronic son -- who doesn't.]
By the way, thinking back I see this story about New Year's resolutions in a new light
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/donald-trump-new-year-resolution_n_5e0c228ee4b0b2520d1bf1a9
Speaking at a party at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, first lady Melania Trump said her resolution is for “peace in the world.” The president wouldn’t give his . . .
In the five days prior to launching a strike that killed Iran’s most important military leader, Donald Trump roamed the halls of Mar-a-Lago, his private resort in Florida, and started dropping hints to close associates and club-goers that something huge was coming . . . Trump began telling friends and allies hanging at his perennial vacation getaway that he was working on a “big” response to the Iranian regime that they would be hearing or reading about very “soon.” Two of these sources tell The Daily Beast that the president specifically mentioned he’d been in close contact with his top national-security and military advisers on gaming out options for an aggressive action that could quickly materialize. “He kept saying, ‘You’ll see,’” one of the sources recalled . . .
The Decision
“When President Trump’s national security team came to his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Monday, they weren’t expecting him to approve an operation to kill Gen. Qassem Suleimani. . . . Why Trump chose this moment to explore an operation against the leader of Iran’s Quds Force, after tolerating Iranian aggression in the Persian Gulf for months, was a matter of debate within his own administration. Officials gave differing and incomplete accounts of the intelligence they said prompted Trump to act. Some said they were stunned by his decision, which could lead to war with one of America’s oldest adversaries in the Middle East.”
Trump on Obama, 2011
https://crooksandliars.com/2020/01/hypocrisy-thy-name-donald-trump
Trump on Obama, 2011
https://crooksandliars.com/2020/01/hypocrisy-thy-name-donald-trump
“Our president will start a war with Iran because he has absolutely no ability to negotiate. He's weak and he's ineffective. So the only way he figures that he's going to get reelected — and as sure as you're sitting there — is to start a war with Iran.”
More: https://www.vox.com/2020/1/3/21048155/trump-obama-war-iran-tweets
[NB: Another example of Trump projection: he thinks presidents think this way, because HE thinks this way.]
Who was Qassem Suleimani?
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2020/01/03/trump-is-now-guilty-of-reckless-endangerment/
More: https://www.vox.com/2020/1/3/21048079/trump-pompeo-iran-lies
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo went on CNN earlier this morning to explain that the Trump administration killed a top Iranian general to forestall an “imminent threat” and that the decision to do so “saved American lives.” . . . It’s obviously possible, in theory, that this is true. But it’s somewhat at odds with the Department of Defense’s statement last night which said merely that Suleimani was “actively developing plans” for attacks and that the American bombing was “aimed at deterring future Iranian attack plans” rather than disrupting an ongoing one. . . .
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-response-soleimani-strike-stop-war
While railing against Soleimani for “plotting imminent and sinister attacks on American diplomats and military personnel,” Trump boasted about how his administration “caught him in the act and terminated him.” . . . The President went on to argue that Soleimani was killed “to stop a war” and that his administration does not seek regime change. “We took action last night to stop a war. We did not take action to start a war,” Trump said.
https://www.vox.com/2020/1/3/21048012/iran-general-killed-qasem-soleimani-legality
More: https://www.vox.com/2020/1/3/21048155/trump-obama-war-iran-tweets
[NB: Another example of Trump projection: he thinks presidents think this way, because HE thinks this way.]
Who was Qassem Suleimani?
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2020/01/03/trump-is-now-guilty-of-reckless-endangerment/
More: https://www.vox.com/2020/1/3/21048079/trump-pompeo-iran-lies
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo went on CNN earlier this morning to explain that the Trump administration killed a top Iranian general to forestall an “imminent threat” and that the decision to do so “saved American lives.” . . . It’s obviously possible, in theory, that this is true. But it’s somewhat at odds with the Department of Defense’s statement last night which said merely that Suleimani was “actively developing plans” for attacks and that the American bombing was “aimed at deterring future Iranian attack plans” rather than disrupting an ongoing one. . . .
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/trump-response-soleimani-strike-stop-war
While railing against Soleimani for “plotting imminent and sinister attacks on American diplomats and military personnel,” Trump boasted about how his administration “caught him in the act and terminated him.” . . . The President went on to argue that Soleimani was killed “to stop a war” and that his administration does not seek regime change. “We took action last night to stop a war. We did not take action to start a war,” Trump said.
https://www.vox.com/2020/1/3/21048012/iran-general-killed-qasem-soleimani-legality
The most significant question has to do with whether the alleged threat from Suleimani and Iran was “imminent,” meaning was it absolutely necessary to act when we did in order to neutralize an attack? If it was, the president has the authority to authorize a strike. If not, well, it’s complicated...
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/trump-soleimani-iran-strike-legal-justification.html
Can the President Just Kill Anyone He Wants Now?
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/3/1909275/-At-a-time-when-Trump-needs-credibility-most-he-s-already-destroyed-it-on-the-world-stage
"The Pentagon is still scrambling right now to tell a story of, Why now? The 'Why now?' is sort of a central question that the Trump administration hasn't really explained." Cooper said she wasn't sure there was any "game plan at this point" in the aftermath of the strike that killed Soleimani. The lack of administration planning has been particularly evident in the fact that the administration failed to brief the Gang of Eight congressional leaders in advance of the strike, along with the notable absence of administration officials who were prepared to explain the strike shortly after its execution. In fact, all that was presented in the immediate aftermath of the attack was an American flag tweeted out by Trump . . .
Reactions from the two parties
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/1/3/21047994/iran-general-soleimani-killed-response-congress-democrats
In other investigation news . . .
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/trump-soleimani-iran-strike-legal-justification.html
Can the President Just Kill Anyone He Wants Now?
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/3/1909275/-At-a-time-when-Trump-needs-credibility-most-he-s-already-destroyed-it-on-the-world-stage
"The Pentagon is still scrambling right now to tell a story of, Why now? The 'Why now?' is sort of a central question that the Trump administration hasn't really explained." Cooper said she wasn't sure there was any "game plan at this point" in the aftermath of the strike that killed Soleimani. The lack of administration planning has been particularly evident in the fact that the administration failed to brief the Gang of Eight congressional leaders in advance of the strike, along with the notable absence of administration officials who were prepared to explain the strike shortly after its execution. In fact, all that was presented in the immediate aftermath of the attack was an American flag tweeted out by Trump . . .
Reactions from the two parties
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/1/3/21047994/iran-general-soleimani-killed-response-congress-democrats
In other investigation news . . .
This is a single-sourced story, and I tend to be suspicious about these. But if true, it is huge (thanks to DK for the lead)
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/3/1909205/-Explosive-report-indicates-that-Donald-Trump-s-loans-from-Deutsche-Bank-were-back-by-Russia
According to Forensic News, Trump’s loans from Deutsche Bank were underwritten by a Russian state-owned bank. That news reportedly comes from a whistleblower with access to documents from both Deutsche Bank and Russia’s state-owned VTB Bank. VTB Bank was also the proposed lender on the never-completed Trump Tower Moscow project. The question of why Deutsche Bank would extend a series of huge loans to Trump has been dangling since before he ever announced his candidacy for president on a golden escalator ride. When Trump first went to Deutsche Bank, he was worse than broke. He had just finished bankrupting multiple casinos in New Jersey, and then had convinced investors to back a takeover of those casinos at a fraction of the original value. Then Trump deliberately allowed the investment group to go bankrupt so he could grab the whole deal himself at a fraction of what his investors had paid. Then he went bankrupt. Again. And along the way he was socked with a massive fine for money laundering at his now bankrupt (again) casino. Trump was so fiscally radioactive that no American bank would let him in the door. But Deutsche Bank turned around and gifted Trump with loans that gave him a fresh start and an apparently miracle turnaround of his New York real estate empire. Those loans have always been the subject of head-scratching over just what Deutsche Bank could have been thinking...
Mitch McConnell says the Trump impeachment trial should be handled just like the Clinton impeachment trial -- no witnesses. Only one problem with that
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/mcconnell-schumer-standoff-impeachment-lingers
During his remarks on the floor Friday, Schumer pointedly reminded McConnell that witnesses were brought to the Senate during Clinton’s impeachment. “Leader McConnell’s comparisons to 1999 are hopelessly flawed and inaccurate,” he said. “There were witnesses in 1999, Leader McConnell. You want the precedent of 1999, there were witnesses as there were in every single impeachment trial of a president in history. It would be a break in precedent for there not to be witnesses.”
More: https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/pelosi-slams-mcconnell-for-being-part-of-cover-up/
Speaker Nancy Pelosi slammed Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in a statement: "Today, Leader McConnell made clear that he will feebly comply with President Trump’s cover-up of his abuses of power and will be an accomplice to that cover-up. Leader McConnell is doubling down on his violation of his oath, even after the exposure of new, deeply incriminating documents this week which provide further evidence of what we know: President Trump abused the power of his office for personal, political gain."
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/impeachment-senate-trial-stalemate.html
The Impeachment Stalemate Is Working Fine for Democrats
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/1/3/1909205/-Explosive-report-indicates-that-Donald-Trump-s-loans-from-Deutsche-Bank-were-back-by-Russia
According to Forensic News, Trump’s loans from Deutsche Bank were underwritten by a Russian state-owned bank. That news reportedly comes from a whistleblower with access to documents from both Deutsche Bank and Russia’s state-owned VTB Bank. VTB Bank was also the proposed lender on the never-completed Trump Tower Moscow project. The question of why Deutsche Bank would extend a series of huge loans to Trump has been dangling since before he ever announced his candidacy for president on a golden escalator ride. When Trump first went to Deutsche Bank, he was worse than broke. He had just finished bankrupting multiple casinos in New Jersey, and then had convinced investors to back a takeover of those casinos at a fraction of the original value. Then Trump deliberately allowed the investment group to go bankrupt so he could grab the whole deal himself at a fraction of what his investors had paid. Then he went bankrupt. Again. And along the way he was socked with a massive fine for money laundering at his now bankrupt (again) casino. Trump was so fiscally radioactive that no American bank would let him in the door. But Deutsche Bank turned around and gifted Trump with loans that gave him a fresh start and an apparently miracle turnaround of his New York real estate empire. Those loans have always been the subject of head-scratching over just what Deutsche Bank could have been thinking...
Mitch McConnell says the Trump impeachment trial should be handled just like the Clinton impeachment trial -- no witnesses. Only one problem with that
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/mcconnell-schumer-standoff-impeachment-lingers
During his remarks on the floor Friday, Schumer pointedly reminded McConnell that witnesses were brought to the Senate during Clinton’s impeachment. “Leader McConnell’s comparisons to 1999 are hopelessly flawed and inaccurate,” he said. “There were witnesses in 1999, Leader McConnell. You want the precedent of 1999, there were witnesses as there were in every single impeachment trial of a president in history. It would be a break in precedent for there not to be witnesses.”
More: https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/pelosi-slams-mcconnell-for-being-part-of-cover-up/
Speaker Nancy Pelosi slammed Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in a statement: "Today, Leader McConnell made clear that he will feebly comply with President Trump’s cover-up of his abuses of power and will be an accomplice to that cover-up. Leader McConnell is doubling down on his violation of his oath, even after the exposure of new, deeply incriminating documents this week which provide further evidence of what we know: President Trump abused the power of his office for personal, political gain."
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/01/impeachment-senate-trial-stalemate.html
The Impeachment Stalemate Is Working Fine for Democrats
These three Senate Repubs could decide the process on an impeachment trial
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/1/3/21031425/senate-impeachment-trial-lisa-murkowski-mitt-romney-susan-collins
More: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/03/democrats-trump-trial-vote-092990
Senate Democrats are expected to almost unanimously declare President Donald Trump guilty at the end of his impeachment trial. But senators across the party’s spectrum insist they haven't made up their mind. It’s a bid to entice a handful of Senate Republicans to join their push for new documents and witnesses involved in the president’s Ukraine scandal, particularly those who have expressed dismay with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s vow to coordinate closely with the White House...
A novel legal theory
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/doj-on-mcgahn-courts-have-no-role-in-fights-between-congress-white-house
Federal courts should not rule on separation-of-powers disputes between Congress and the White House, the Justice Department argued Friday. The oral arguments came in D.C. federal appeals court as the House Judiciary Committee seeks to enforce a subpoena it issued in April for testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn. . . . [read on]
And another one
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/appeals-hearing-house-judiciary-committee-mueller-grand-jury-docs
Trump Judge Suggests DOJ Could Ignore Order OKing Release Of Mueller Grand Jury Docs
And another one
https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/white-house-withholds-20-emails-on-ukraine-aid/
“The Trump administration disclosed on Friday that there were 20 emails between a top aide to President Trump’s acting chief of staff and a colleague at the White House’s Office of Management and Budget discussing the freeze of a congressionally mandated military aid package for Ukraine . . . But in response to a court order that it swiftly process those pages in response to a Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, lawsuit filed by The New York Times, the Office of Management and Budget delivered a terse letter saying it would not turn over any of the 40 pages of emails — not even with redactions.”
[NB: It goes without saying, but this is what guilty poeple do.]
Of course
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/new-mueller-docs-tie-manafort-more-closely-to-ukraine-pressure-campaign
New Mueller Docs Tie Manafort More Closely To Ukraine Pressure Campaign
More: https://www.emptywheel.net/2020/01/03/how-paul-manafort-lied-to-mueller-to-protect-jared-kushner/
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/1/3/21031425/senate-impeachment-trial-lisa-murkowski-mitt-romney-susan-collins
More: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/01/03/democrats-trump-trial-vote-092990
Senate Democrats are expected to almost unanimously declare President Donald Trump guilty at the end of his impeachment trial. But senators across the party’s spectrum insist they haven't made up their mind. It’s a bid to entice a handful of Senate Republicans to join their push for new documents and witnesses involved in the president’s Ukraine scandal, particularly those who have expressed dismay with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s vow to coordinate closely with the White House...
A novel legal theory
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/doj-on-mcgahn-courts-have-no-role-in-fights-between-congress-white-house
Federal courts should not rule on separation-of-powers disputes between Congress and the White House, the Justice Department argued Friday. The oral arguments came in D.C. federal appeals court as the House Judiciary Committee seeks to enforce a subpoena it issued in April for testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn. . . . [read on]
And another one
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/appeals-hearing-house-judiciary-committee-mueller-grand-jury-docs
Trump Judge Suggests DOJ Could Ignore Order OKing Release Of Mueller Grand Jury Docs
And another one
https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/white-house-withholds-20-emails-on-ukraine-aid/
“The Trump administration disclosed on Friday that there were 20 emails between a top aide to President Trump’s acting chief of staff and a colleague at the White House’s Office of Management and Budget discussing the freeze of a congressionally mandated military aid package for Ukraine . . . But in response to a court order that it swiftly process those pages in response to a Freedom of Information Act, or FOIA, lawsuit filed by The New York Times, the Office of Management and Budget delivered a terse letter saying it would not turn over any of the 40 pages of emails — not even with redactions.”
[NB: It goes without saying, but this is what guilty poeple do.]
Of course
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/new-mueller-docs-tie-manafort-more-closely-to-ukraine-pressure-campaign
New Mueller Docs Tie Manafort More Closely To Ukraine Pressure Campaign
More: https://www.emptywheel.net/2020/01/03/how-paul-manafort-lied-to-mueller-to-protect-jared-kushner/
In other news . . .
Another woman
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/courtney-friel-donald-trump-kiss_n_5e0f164cc5b6b5a713b8af65
Former Fox News reporter Courtney Friel says that Donald Trump propositioned her before he was elected president while both were married, and that the come-on compromised her reporting on his presidential campaign. Friel wrote in her new memoir “Tonight At 10: Kicking Booze and Breaking News” that Trump called her “the hottest one at Fox News” . . . Trump, in a phone call, complimented Friel’s work and asked about career goals before getting more personal, she wrote. “Out of nowhere, he said: ‘You should come up to my office sometime, so we can kiss.’” . . .
Will attacking Iran help Trump's re-election?
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/01/trump-war-iran-election-nuclear-obama.html
A poll earlier this summer found that just 18 percent of Americans prefer to “take military action against Iran” as against 78 percent wanting to “rely mainly on economic and diplomatic efforts.” . . . [read on]
Interestingly, Fox World is not totally on board with the Suleimani attack
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/soleimani-strike-fox-news-reaction
https://crooksandliars.com/2020/01/did-donald-trump-just-end-tucker-carlsons
Chicken or egg? https://crooksandliars.com/2020/01/hours-after-fox-anchor-promoted-military
Hours After Fox Anchor Pushed Iran Military Strike, Soleimani Was Killed
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-biggest-fox-news-boosters-suddenly-stop-railing-against-deep-state-intelligence
Suddenly, it appears the U.S. intelligence community is back in good standing over at Fox News. . . .
Trump points to the stock market (as long as it's going up) as an indicator of economic vitality. It isn't. Serious people look at indicators like these
https://www.axios.com/us-manufacturing-index-ism-lowest-great-recession-af6fb388-9cee-4944-8955-6aec166671ea.html
The Institute of Supply Management's index of manufacturing activity released Friday hit its lowest level since the end of the Great Recession in December. . . It shows worsening conditions for the U.S. manufacturing sector, which has been in contraction for five straight months, and reignites concerns about the trade war's impact on the economy. . .
An assault on social programs
https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2020/01/raw-data-new-snap-rules-will-cut-benefit-rolls/
New SNAP Rules Will Cut Benefit Rolls
https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/trump-will-further-weaken-fair-housing-laws/
Trump Will Further Weaken Fair Housing Laws
Trump's dilemma
https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/trump-needs-to-coax-more-votes-from-a-shrinking-base/
Trump Needs to Coax More Votes from a Shrinking Base
More: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-evangelical-coalition-launch_n_5e0f5854e4b0b2520d2084c3
Donald Trump is launching “Evangelicals for Trump” . . .
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/476730-trump-rallies-evangelical-supporters-we-have-god-on-our-side
Trump rallies evangelical supporters: 'We have God on our side'
[NB: As the old joke goes, "What do you mean WE?"]
Another GOPer retires from Congress -- that's more than two dozen now
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/476649-gop-rep-phil-roe-wont-seek-reelection
Elizabeth Warren's quarterly fundraising drops, Amy Klobuchar's doubles
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/courtney-friel-donald-trump-kiss_n_5e0f164cc5b6b5a713b8af65
Former Fox News reporter Courtney Friel says that Donald Trump propositioned her before he was elected president while both were married, and that the come-on compromised her reporting on his presidential campaign. Friel wrote in her new memoir “Tonight At 10: Kicking Booze and Breaking News” that Trump called her “the hottest one at Fox News” . . . Trump, in a phone call, complimented Friel’s work and asked about career goals before getting more personal, she wrote. “Out of nowhere, he said: ‘You should come up to my office sometime, so we can kiss.’” . . .
Will attacking Iran help Trump's re-election?
http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2020/01/trump-war-iran-election-nuclear-obama.html
A poll earlier this summer found that just 18 percent of Americans prefer to “take military action against Iran” as against 78 percent wanting to “rely mainly on economic and diplomatic efforts.” . . . [read on]
Interestingly, Fox World is not totally on board with the Suleimani attack
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/soleimani-strike-fox-news-reaction
https://crooksandliars.com/2020/01/did-donald-trump-just-end-tucker-carlsons
Chicken or egg? https://crooksandliars.com/2020/01/hours-after-fox-anchor-promoted-military
Hours After Fox Anchor Pushed Iran Military Strike, Soleimani Was Killed
https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-biggest-fox-news-boosters-suddenly-stop-railing-against-deep-state-intelligence
Suddenly, it appears the U.S. intelligence community is back in good standing over at Fox News. . . .
Trump points to the stock market (as long as it's going up) as an indicator of economic vitality. It isn't. Serious people look at indicators like these
https://www.axios.com/us-manufacturing-index-ism-lowest-great-recession-af6fb388-9cee-4944-8955-6aec166671ea.html
The Institute of Supply Management's index of manufacturing activity released Friday hit its lowest level since the end of the Great Recession in December. . . It shows worsening conditions for the U.S. manufacturing sector, which has been in contraction for five straight months, and reignites concerns about the trade war's impact on the economy. . .
An assault on social programs
https://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2020/01/raw-data-new-snap-rules-will-cut-benefit-rolls/
New SNAP Rules Will Cut Benefit Rolls
https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/trump-will-further-weaken-fair-housing-laws/
Trump Will Further Weaken Fair Housing Laws
Trump's dilemma
https://politicalwire.com/2020/01/03/trump-needs-to-coax-more-votes-from-a-shrinking-base/
Trump Needs to Coax More Votes from a Shrinking Base
More: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-evangelical-coalition-launch_n_5e0f5854e4b0b2520d2084c3
Donald Trump is launching “Evangelicals for Trump” . . .
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/476730-trump-rallies-evangelical-supporters-we-have-god-on-our-side
Trump rallies evangelical supporters: 'We have God on our side'
[NB: As the old joke goes, "What do you mean WE?"]
Another GOPer retires from Congress -- that's more than two dozen now
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/476649-gop-rep-phil-roe-wont-seek-reelection
Elizabeth Warren's quarterly fundraising drops, Amy Klobuchar's doubles
Bonus item: The Ten Most Outrageous Obama Scandals
***If you enjoy Progressive Blog
Digest and support what we are doing, you can help by forwarding a copy of this
issue to your friends (using the envelope link below) or by sharing its URL
(http://pbd.blogspot.com) with others via email or social media. Thanks for
helping to spread the word!
I don’t get anything personally out of
this project, except the satisfaction of doing it (I don’t run ads, etc.). The
credit really all goes to the people whose material I copy and redistribute.
But if I do have a “mission,” it is to get this information into the hands of
as many people as I can.***











