Trump
now says no one briefed him on the Russia-Afghanistan bounty on US
troops because they didn't find the underlying intel credible. Do you
believe him?
[NB: The DNI and others who have tried to make excuses never said the intel was not credible. Wouldn't that be the first explanation you would provide, if it were the case?]
Of course they are lying: https://crooksandliars.com/2020/06/joe-scarborough-bounty-story-how-stupid-do
"This is considered so serious by our intelligence agencies that they convene a meeting at the end of March, and we notify -- our government notifies the British government to warn them that there are also bounties on the heads of British soldiers from Vladimir Putin. And yet, this warning, the White House wants you to believe that despite the fact the CIA knew it, despite the fact that the president's own national security council knew it, despite the fact that it was so serious they convened a meeting in March to consider a range of options to take against the Russian government and Vladimir Putin for putting bounties on the heads of young American troops, despite the fact it was considered so serious they notified the British, think about this. "You're being told that they notified the British government, but they didn't even tell the President of the United States. I'll just ask, how stupid do they think you are? "And how low does the president think he can take you, and his supporters, in supporting a president who was told in a presidential daily briefing months ago, to the man that he called a friend of his in May, was putting bounties on the heads of U.S. troops back in 2019. It is -- it is just mind-blowing. Mind-blowing. And here's the thing. It's all going to come out. The truth is all going to come out."
The Cheerleader's tip-toeing around the issue tells you they know there is a Big Problem here
McEnany stuck closely to talking points throughout the briefing, repeating several times that “there is no consensus within the intelligence community” on the intelligence related to the Russian bounty program. Pressed for specifics about whether the president was made aware of the intelligence, she declined to elaborate beyond saying that Trump had not been personally briefed on the information.
Even GOP senators want answers
A key Trump ally, Senator Lindsey Graham, said on Saturday it was “imperative Congress get to the bottom of” the allegations about Russia. “I expect the Trump administration to take such allegations seriously and inform Congress immediately as to the reliability of these news reports,” the South Carolina Republican said . . .
Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.) sent a letter to President Trump on Monday calling for Senate hearings over media reports that U.S. intelligence assessed that a Russian spy unit offered bounties to Taliban-linked militants for killing U.S. troops in Afghanistan. . .
Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.) says Congress needs to get to the bottom of what President Trump was told about Russia offering bounties to Taliban militants to kill coalition troops in Afghanistan . . .
The WH said there would be a "briefing" for lawmakers on the controversy. Here's what that "briefing" turned out to be
In a meeting today, Trump administration officials (and recent House Republicans) John Ratcliffe and Mark Meadows briefed a small set of sycophantic Republican lawmakers on what the talking points defending Trump would be. We know precisely what was decided on because Rep. Jim Banks immediately tweeted out the results after the meeting. He blamed the Times for reporting an "ONGOING" investigation, claiming "blood is on their hands." He also repeated, verbatim, Trump's own ridiculous and asinine claim that "[n]o President in my lifetime has been tougher on Russia than Trump"—a statement simply at odds with provable reality. We can gather, then, that the House Republican response will be to burp out literal White House talking points.
It will all come out
Senators will have access to intelligence documents related to reporting that Russia’s military intelligence unit, the GRU, offered bounties to Taliban militants to kill U.S. troops in Afghanistan. . . .
THIS is what I've been expecting all along -- we know Trump hates his intel briefings and doesn't read his PDBs
CNN is reporting that, despite denials by Donald Trump and White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany, information on Russia paying bounties for the murder of American soldiers was included in Trump’s “daily brief.” That briefing happened “sometime in the spring,” though CNN does not indicate that their source provided a precise date for the briefing. The source indicated that this was such a big deal — directly involving the safety of American forces in Afghanistan — that it certainly would have been included in information that reached Trump. However, there is still a sense in which Trump might not have been briefed, even though he was. That’s because, as CNN notes, “Trump is not known to fully or regularly read the President's Daily Brief.” So there remains the possibility that Trump didn’t know about Russia putting a price tag on the heads of American soldiers, because he was so incompetent, and so unconcerned with the safety of the military, that he simply didn’t read the report. . . .
Trump Got Written Briefing in February on Possible Russian Bounties, Officials Say
With Trump, there's a tweet for everything
[Donald J. Trump] Fact--Obama does not read his intelligence briefings nor does he get briefed in person by the CIA or DOD. Too busy I guess! - Sep 30, 2014
Trump's plague
Why Isn't Media Addressing Trump's COVID-19 Surrender?
HHS Sect'y says states should halt re-opening because people just aren't acting responsibly
[NB: And whose fault is THAT?]
Another 5-4 SC decision with Chief Justice John Roberts on the side of the liberals, striking down a super-restrictive Louisiana abortion law
But let's not turn Roberts into a hero just yet . . .
Chief Justice John Roberts decided that now was not the time for a big decision allowing states to effectively outlaw abortion . . .
In another case, not so good
The Supreme Court’s big decision on the CFPB and the “unitary executive,” explained . . . Chief Justice Roberts’s opinion can be read two ways. One of them could be catastrophic. . . .
When Bob Woodward decided NOT to out Brett Kavanaugh
As discussed yesterday, Trump wants to kill the Affordable Care Act with NO PLAN to replace it. Now his HHS Sect'y admits that's true
Azar: Sure, Trump still doesn't have 'exact details' for a healthcare system, but trust us . . . "We will work with Congress to create a program that genuinely protects individuals with preexisting conditions." . . . Azar also told Tapper the plan they don't have details on now would be "something very different than what we see today."
House Moves to Expand Obamacare
In investigation news . . .
Barr ruined the Mueller investigation. But Mueller let it happen
In other news . . .
Trump shares video of white couple pointing guns at protesters in St. Louis
[NB: Trump keeps saying he supports the rights of peaceful protest, and keeps showing that he doesn't.]
WH Says Trump Retweeted ‘White Power’ Video To Stand With ‘Demonized’ Supporters
[NB: Yes, because why should we "demonize" people who shout "White Power" or point guns at unarmed peaceful protesters? It's just so UNFAIR.]
Social media sites find that Trump sites are full of hate
Twitch Suspends Trump’s Channel for ‘Hateful Conduct’
Reddit Bans Trump Page For Repeated Rules Violations
Snapchat to stop promoting Trump after controversial posts
Facebook Pulls Down Trump Campaign’s Ad With Nazi Symbolism for Hate-Speech Violations
Is Trump’s Social Media Firewall Starting to Crumble?
Every season it seems that a relatively unimportant culture war issue gets weaponized by the Repubs to whip up voter frenzy and drive turnout. Will it be pulling down Confederate statues this time?
"Our"?
White Nationalist 'President' Tells Black Americans To 'Learn Our History'
Trump pulled his convention from Charlotte, NC because they required masks and social distancing. Now Jacksonville expects the same thing
Trump is turning the entire Federal government into a nest of loyalists and ideologues -- and the next president's #1 job is going to be clearing them all out
Trump points to a NJ case to "prove" that mail-in voting leads to fraud. But what it really shows is that it is easy to detect actual fraud, when it happens
Doesn't sound like someone getting ready to quit
"Sorry to inform the Do Nothing Democrats, but I am getting VERY GOOD internal Polling Numbers. Just like 2016, the @nytimes Polls are Fake! The @FoxNews Polls are a JOKE! Do you think they will apologize to me & their subscribers AGAIN when I WIN?"
Meanwhile, in the real world . . .
Trump’s Disapproval Rate Soars
The books by former Trump staff reveal a strongly consistent image of a deeply dysfunctional administration
But taken all together, these staffer memoirs offer a sense of something that no outsider can ever completely understand: what it’s like to live in Trump World. That’s what its denizens call the alternate reality surrounding our petty, distractible, praise-hungry president. Under its spell, people strive to gain and hold onto their perches in what has to be one of the worst workplaces in the history of the ruling classes, short of Caligula’s Rome. . . [T]he mad tea party that is Trump World. . . . [read on]
The Trump Organization has a business plan for after Trump leaves office
Princeton removed Woodrow Wilson's name from their public policy school. Here's why
Will the Dems reform the filibuster if they retake the Senate?
Bonus item: John Oliver on Mike Pence's coronavirus lies
***If you enjoy Progressive Blog Digest and support what we are doing, you can help by forwarding a copy of this issue to your friends (using the envelope link below) or by sharing its URL (http://pbd.blogspot.com) with others via email or social media. Thanks for helping to spread the word!
I don’t get anything personally out of this project, except the satisfaction of doing it (I don’t run ads, etc.). The credit really all goes to the people whose material I copy and redistribute. But if I do have a “mission,” it is to get this information into the hands of as many people as I can.***